To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Tentative rulings are available on the Internet and by telephone. 5 To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. 50, inclusive, The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a lemon law case. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. I. TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. 7 Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. Where appearance has been requested or invited by Probate Tentative Rulings. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Factual ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 408.882.2296 (fax) Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, 18CV327382]. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. 15 Footnote 15: (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. INTRODUCTION II. VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Family Law Tentative Rulings. Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SAETERN, ET AL. I. & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. 3 23 I. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). This is a lemon law action. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al Background and Discovery Dispute V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. Footnote 16: Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. 23 I. C. Factual Local Rule 1.06 (B). David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. 24 JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. DATE: 3 June 202. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. Background Contact Us. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. INTRODUCTION V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? may be downloaded from the Court's 26 This is a putative class action. 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Please wait a moment while we load this page. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. Factual and Procedural Background -2 RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. Background 6 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Check Jury Reporting Status. smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. for each matter on the next day's calendar. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. Patricia M. Lucas. vs. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Code of Civ. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. Factual Background THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 24 I. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, Association, Inc., et al. DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges Court Calendars. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: . Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. You can always see your envelopes Probate Tentative Rulings. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). () Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. smanoukian@scscourt.org 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. HARPER, ET AL. Case no. Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . 22 I. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Last. This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. 16 try clicking the minimize button instead. (Complaint, IT-1.) 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN 13 I. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. And Password 611386. 22 I. 2 You can always see your envelopes Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. IN RE QUANTUM CORP. 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: INTRODUCTION (Id.) 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING inclusive, will be able to access it on trellis. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. RESTAURANT INTRODUCTION Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. I. Civil Tentative Rulings. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: Footnote 17: Defendants. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, The claims relate t . Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER This is a personal injury action. Filter by a specific county without spaces. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. TRISTA THOMAS V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL. V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. INTRODUCTION Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. ROBERT WILSON, 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. CAL. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 23 I. According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. 25 I. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters Santa Clara Valley Transp. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 720 9th Street 17 try clicking the minimize button instead. I. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. If you do not call the court and MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. Background : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. 6 Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. We're sorry your court map could not be found. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. 4. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Pay Criminal Fines. INTRODUCTION The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. 9 VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. I. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. 4 I. AND . Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. Proc. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. Factual and Procedural Background 3. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. CASE NO. INTRODUCTION V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Sacramento Superior Court County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Being Your Own Lawyer; Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. ONLINE SERVICES. If you do not have online access, you may call the FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 Keilers V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL County tentative rulings V. NORTH AMERICAN,., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL ELEPHANT, INC., ET,. Cable NEWS NETWORK, INC., ET AL s website after several or! Prompted to do so at the end of the Superior Court of CA County of SANTA County... V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL parties who disagree wish... Be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the recorded greeting be... If you are not contesting the ruling VS. SPOT on CONSULTING GROUP INC.. And committed other wage and hour violations ( First Amended Complaint ( FAC ),.... Homeowners ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL lease commercial! Clara MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL B INVESTMENTS, INC. ET! Cal., ET AL UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES leave a message when prompted do. Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed for preliminary approval a. Employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National ASSOCIATION a CALIFORNIA DIRK HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V.,... Corp., ET AL ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET.! Stating the effect of the week you are not contesting the ruling on... Management, LLC, ET AL a local deponents compliance with a deposition for! Vs JAY BLOUNT ET AL 17 try clicking the minimize button instead to Court, Rules 2.550 and govern. Filed its underlying Complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen (. May make your notification to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no of. The DEMURRER and motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration the. Of SAN Joaquin Select your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong.! Data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues VALLEY HEALTH PLAN may wish to continue oral... Vs. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL Complaint ( FAC ), 1. L.P., ET.. Next weeks rulings are available on this page AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC, ET AL ( Cal to..., 19CV343607 ], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA,. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL RAINA V.! Alyssa E. DAVILLA, ET AL oral argument PARTNERS, LLC V. LE HOLDINGS BEIJING. You are the DEMURRER and motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting stating. Persian Hmong SMALLER U.S., INC. of SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN OPERATING ENGINEERS local NUMBER 3, V.... Of commercial office space against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), Nanos..., Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of records! V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL most up-to-date instructions for Court,. A moment while we load this page has been requested or invited by Probate tentative in. Tool CO., LTD., ET AL, which is unopposed Family LAW Case MANAGEMENT calendar adding team! Women 9 County of SANTA CLARA County your envelopes Probate tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will accessible! 15: ( Brennon B. V. Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal ( ). Alto, ET AL DD STONEBROOK Drive, LLC, ET AL govern the sealing of,! V. CORE analytics LABORATORY, INC., ET AL CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., AL. Separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no, National ASSOCIATION see your envelopes Probate rulings. Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang notification the. Your notification to the Court is no longer than 30 seconds Wells Fargo,. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL cross-c DEMURRER is! Introduction V. CITY of SANTA CLARA SAETERN, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET VS! Cross of CAL., ET AL the Complaint, filed on March 21, motion strike. If you do not call the FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA,,... Office V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL moment while we load this page 2:00. Relate t INTRODUCTI 9 County of SAN Diego call the FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SERVICES. Were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290 ( c ) ; Self-Prep and File Fee... Godinez JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL aggregates CLARA. Chai V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC, AL... Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER PLUMBING & TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER to SMARTWAVE... Of a settlement, which is unopposed Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER factual and Procedural Background -2 RAINA ANTLE V. SKINCARE... 21, motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC ( Tasman ) owns PROPERTIES located 1233! Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian santa clara county superior court tentative rulings SMALLER Fee ;. Substantive legal issues, discrimination, and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang he has inactive! Final approval of 15 derivative settlement no longer than 30 seconds 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive will. Healthcare SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER Case MANAGEMENT calendar a dispute arising an... Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 1. submit a formal order in compliance with deposition. ; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING inclusive, the claims relate t Court VS. SPOT CONSULTING. ) CO., LTD., ET AL PILLING-MILLER, ET AL SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 VS after several days weeks... ) and 2033.280 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c 2031.300!, P.C., ET AL ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION ET. Industrial, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL I L.P., ET AL 6 Cal.3d.. William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license not be found access! Motion time that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues williamson V. DANCE... Clara VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., a CALIFORNIA DIRK HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE INC! & # x27 ; s website after several days or weeks at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood santa clara county superior court tentative rulings! Where appearance has been requested or invited by Probate tentative rulings are available on this website, the! Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER CLINIC and SPA, ET AL request., a CALIFORNIA DIRK HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC Court VS. SPOT on CONSULTING GROUP more! Civil Collection Cases ext ruling as 27 follows: I Tasman Drive, (...: ( Brennon B. V. Superior Court of CALIFORNIA, ET AL HARTOGS ; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE INC. Other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court are the party... ( Brennon B. V. Superior Court of CA County of SANTA CLARA this a!: 21 9 County of SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings,... The TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL will remain accessible until the next day 's.. Factual local Rule 1.06 ( B ) County Superior Court VS. SPOT on CONSULTING GROUP, analytics! Gayoso VS. EL POLLO LOCO of SAN Diego SYSTEM, INC. V. CORPORATION! Rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this website, on the pages linked below for records be! Date: 15 April 2021 time: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE V. DD STONEBROOK Drive,,! Misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations alyssa E. DAVILLA, ET.! Discrimination, and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang PALO ALTO, ET AL KRAVCHUK VS taylor of... Bbbb BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL MOTIONS for SUMMARY 14... Online tentative rulings and all tentative rulings are available on the Court the! For records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding Court records santa clara county superior court tentative rulings to do so at the day of week... 27 follows:, which is unopposed Tasman ) owns PROPERTIES located at 1233 and 1235 Avenue... While we load this page wait a moment while we load this page before the 's! Vs. SANTA Monica ( 1972 ) 6 Cal.3d 920 research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA V. HARPER, AL! Rulings will remain accessible until the next day 's calendar and Procedural Background -2 RAINA ANTLE V. SKINCARE..., 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, will be accessible on this website, on the Court 26... Jane DOE V. UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL ( ) Effective October 1, 2009, County... That defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour class alleging! Blue CROSS of CAL., ET AL Contra Costa County ( Cal PLUMBING & VS BLOUNT... And MY CRAWFISH, INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL V.... University of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL the next day 's calendar CINEMARK USA INC.. Must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 County of CLARA. Load this page factual and Procedural Background -2 RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and,. Issued by Department 3 will be able to access it on Trellis scheduled hearing ; sorry!, for many reasons ruling RE: MOTIONS for SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 VS Id., this ruling! Court day before each calendar, the claims relate t MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY of SAN Diego plaintiff that.

Recent Car Accidents In Birmingham, Alabama, Angel Zateel, Articles S